Challenges in the comparative analysis of developments of the public administrations – The case of Hungary

Authors:
András Bojtor, special Office of Research Methodology and Measurement, National University of Public Service
Gábor Bozsó, special Office of Research Methodology and Measurement, National University of Public Service

Abstract:

Several reforms were introduced in the Hungarian public administration in the last decade that reshaped both the local and central governance levels. A well-functioning administration with embedded institutions enables the formulation of a competitive environment that favorably effects the country’s economic growth. The projects of the reform program are partly financed by the European Union’s Cohesion Funds through the Hungarian Public Administration and Civil Service Development Operation Programme. Hungary is committed to attain a good state through good governance and devoted to implement a results-oriented approach in its policy cycles. The international indexes providing comparisons among public administrations of different countries cannot fully and in detail reflect the results and impact of executed projects. As a response to the need for continuous monitoring based on data, the Hungarian Government introduced a unique pilot evidence-based assessment framework connected to the selected projects of the Hungarian Public Administration and Civil Service Development Operation Programme. The institutional framework is provided by the National University of Public Service, utilizing the advantage of its research and professional expertise. The results and impacts are measured and continuously monitored both at project and national levels. The steady monitoring and data gathering provides a good basis for a comprehensive evaluation and further policy-making.

References:

[1] MINISZTERELNÖKSÉG. Közigazgatás- és Közszolgáltatás-fejlesztési Stratégia 2014-2020 2015.

[2] KAISER, T., (ed.) Measurability of Good State and Governance II 2017.

[3] MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND JUSTICE. Magyar Zoltán Public Administration Development Programme (MP 12.0) 2012.

[4] KISS, N., The Quality of Governance and its Assessment. in Kádár, K. (ed.). Good Governance. International Dimensions 2014.

[5] UNITED NATIONS. Transformation our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 2015.

[6] EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. 2010.

[7] EUROPEAN COMMISSION. My Region, My Europe, Our Future. Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. 2017.

[8] MCCANN, P., The Regional and Urban Policy of the European Union. 2015.

[9] BELCHER, B. & PALENBERG, M., Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions. in: American Journal of Evaluation, 109821401876569 2018.

[10] ROTBERG, R. I. (ed.). On Governance, What It Is, What It Measrures and its Policy Uses 2015.

[11] WASEDA, & IAC. The 14th WASEDA-IAC International Digital Government Rankings 2018 2018.

[12] UNITED NATIONS. E-Government Survey 2018. Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies 2018.

[13] OECD. Toolkit for the preparation, implementation, monitoring, reporting and evaluation of administration reform and sector strategies 2018.

[14] KAISER, T. (ed.). Good State and Governance Report 2016.

Publication:

Central and Eastern European e|Dem and e|Gov Days 2019

Cyber Security and eGovernment
Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European E|Dem and E|Gov Days, May 2-3, 2019, Budapest
Facultas, 1. Ed., 536 p.
ISBN: 978-3-7089-1898-3,
ISBN: 978-3-903035-24-9

Editors: András Nemeslaki, Alexander Prosser, Dona Scola, Tamás Szádeczky