Abstract:

The idea of so-called “Participatory Budgeting” (PB) has recently re-entered the modern political discourse. Major metropoles, such as New York, are making progress beyond mere piloting by paving the road for mandatory PB with new legislation, while communities of various sizes and politicians of various ranks all around the world aim to follow suit in an attempt to maintain an image of democratic progress. This paper shall scrutinize PB and provide a critique of PB from the perspective of democratic innovation. Another concept for increasing democratic power of citizens shall be described – the Quantum Budget. The Quantum Budget is an innovative way of funding communal projects that bases on Liquid Democracy. The paper will compare the Quantum Budget to Participatory Budgeting and provide a discussion on their potentials and weaknesses.

References:

[1] BINKS, M., 2014. The Crucial Role of Universities in Promoting Radical Innovation. The Business Growth Benefits of Higher Education. D. Greenaway and C.D. Rudd, eds. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 91–108.

[2] BLUM, C. and ZUBER, C. I., 2016. Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives: Liquid Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy. 24, 2 (Jun. 2016), p. 162–182.

[3] BOJE, C. and MASSER, K., 2014. Bestandsaufnahme Demokratie und Bürgerbeteiligung 2014.

[4] GELDMACHER-MUSIOL, T., KORBEI, R., MUSIOL, D. and SCHENK, B., 2018. Sozialwissenschaftliche Machbarkeit. Beteiligungshaushalt auf Landesebene. Baden-Württemberg Stiftung, ed. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. p. 7–81.

[5] O’REILLY, T., 2010. Government as a Platform. Open Government - Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. D. Lathrop and L. Ruma, eds. O’Reilly. p. 11–39.

[6] PAULIN, A., 2019. Digitalized Governance—An Embezzled Opportunity? Smart City Governance. Elsevier. p. 39–60.

[7] PAULIN, A., 2019. Smart City Governance. Elsevier.

[8] PAULIN, A., 2019. Summary and Outlook. Smart City Governance. Elsevier. p. 271–278.

[9] PAULIN, A., 2014. Through Liquid Democracy to Sustainable Non-Bureaucratic Government - Harnessing the Power of ICTs for a novel form of Digital Government. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government. 6, 2 (2014), p. 216–230.

[10] PELED, A., 2014. Traversing digital Babel: information, e-government, and exchange. The MIT Press.

[11] REDDICK, C. G. and TURNER, M., 2012. Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: Comparing e-government to traditional service delivery. Government Information Quarterly. 29, 1 (Jan. 2012), p. 1–11.