In a resource abundant environment, the people of Iraq have no right in the governance system. Thus, Iraq faces significant challenges in E-governance. In order to enhance E-governance and transparency in Iraq there is a need for creating an E-governance system that can motivate citizen participation in governance in the long-run. Citizen participation is not effective, similar to the case of many other resource-rich countries in the Middle East and Africa. Since 2003, the Iraqi government has tried to tackle transparency, open governance, e-elections and e-governance; however, it failed. The failure may be attributed to different factors but the most crucial and influential one is lack of citizen participation. If people nurture E-governance, their collective effort will support government’s effort in building a strong E-governance system. The main question for this study is; how can citizen participation contribute in nurturing E-governance in the case of Iraq? This study outlines the role of effective citizen participation in creating E-governance in Iraq; this is a quantitative study Primary data collected from 100 participants was analyzed for this purpose. This study is composed of three main parts; the first part highlights theoretical perspective of E-governance in Iraq, and citizen participation. The second part focuses on discussing the data on e-governance. The final session of this study deals with the findings, and conclusions.
 BRANS, M., FERRARO, G. & ESTORFF, U. V., The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency’s Forum on Stakeholder Confidence, radioactive waste management and public participation, European Commission/ Joint Research Centre, Netherlands, 2015.
 ARNSTEIN, S. R., A Ladder of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35: 4, 1969, p. 216 — 224.
 COLLIER, P., The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are failing and What Can Be Done about It, New York, the United States of America, Oxford University Press, 2007.
 ETZIONI, A., (1968). The active society, a theory of societal and political processes, New York, the United States of America, the Free Press.
 KJAR, A. M., Governance, key concepts, Bodmin, Great Britain, Polity Press, 2004.
 KOMITO, L., E-Participation and Governance: Widening the net, The Electronic Journal of e-Government, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2005, pp 39-48 available online at: www.ejeg.com.
 LAUBER, T. B. & KNUTH, B. A., Citizen Participation in Natural Resource Management: A Synthesis of HDRU Research, HDRU Series, No 00-7, 2000.
 LI, M. & GREGOR, S., Outcomes of effective explanations: Empowering citizens through online advice. Decision support systems, 52(1), 2011, 119-132.
 MODINIS Study, Breaking barriers to e-Government, E-government Unit, DG Information Society and Media, European Commission, 23/12/2007.
 GRONLUND, A., Introducing e-Gov: History, definitions, and issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 713-729, 2004.
 NDOU, V., E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries 18 (1), 2004, 1-24.
 ROBERTS, N. C., (ed.). The age of direct citizen participation, an ASPA Classics Volume, New York, USA, Routledge, 2008.
Cyber Security and eGovernment
Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European E|Dem and E|Gov Days, May 2-3, 2019, Budapest
Facultas, 1. Ed., 536 p.
Editors: András Nemeslaki, Alexander Prosser, Dona Scola, Tamás Szádeczky