E-Democracy and E-Tools of citizen participation on local level in Poland

Authors:
Magdalena Musiał-Karg, Faculty of Political Science and Journalism, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Abstract:

The development of information and communication technologies (ICT) brought many changes in various areas of human life. Also, democracy is being influenced by the use of electronic communication technologies, such as the Internet. ICT’s impact on democracy and participation has led to the emergence of specific tools that allow citizens to use electronic tools of political participation. The use of technology in politics is a fascinating example of interaction between technology, public policy and also public opinion. How the law and society respond to advanced technology is worthy of study, particularly in countries, where e-tools of people’s participation are becoming more and more popular among certain groups of political actors. The application of information and communication technologies in political decision-making processes in Poland is relatively new phenomenon – we may say that it has been observed for not more than 15 years. This paper will analyze Polish local practices and also attitudes of the Poles towards selected e-tools of civic participation on local level. Findings presented in the article prove that it is worth to consider the implementation of new participation solutions, since the society is interested in new convenient forms of participation in public life – not only on the local level but certainly also on the state level as well.

References:

[1] BRUNDIGE, J., RICE, R., Political engagement online: do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar?, in: A. Chadwick, P. H. Howar (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, London–New York

[2] CLIFT, S., E-Democracy, E-Governance and Public Net-Work (Government 2.0) – Overview, 2003, http://stevenclift.com/?p=104, accessesd: 14.01.2019.

[3] DOUS, Z. M. Z., SEWISY, A. A., SEDDIK, M. F., Decision Making Techniques and Tools Based On Decision Support System, Journal Of Engineering Research And Application www.ijera.Com, Vol. 8, Issue3, (2018)

[4] eEurope 2005: An information society for all. An Action Plan to be presented in view of the Sevilla European Council, 21/22 June 2002, Commision of the European Communities, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2002:0263:FIN:EN:PDF, accessed 14.01.2018.

[5] GIL-GARCIA, J. R., GONZALEZ-MIRANDA, F., E-government and Opportunities for Participa-tion: The Case of the Mexican State Web Portals, in: C. Reddick (ed.)., Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management, , IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2010.

[6] GRÖNLUND, Å., Emerging electronic infrastructures – Exploring democratic components, in: Social Science Computer Review, no. 1 (21) (2003).

[7] HAJDUK, S., E-partycypacja jako nowoczesna forma komunikacji w zarządzaniu przestrzennym miast, on: Studia i Prace. Zeszyt Naukowy Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, SGH, no 170 (2018).

[8] KATZ, J., RICE, R., Social Consequences of Internet Use, Access, Involvement, and Interaction, London.

[9] KRAEMER, K., KING, K., Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will e-Government be Different?, „The International Journal of Electronic Government Research” 2, no 1 (2005).

[10] LUTEREK, M., E-government. Systemy informacji publicznej, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa, 2010.

[11] MADISE, Ű., VINKEL, P., Constitutionality of Remote Internet Voting: The Estonian Perspective, in: Juridica International no XVIII (2011).

[12] MCCORMACK, C. B., Democracy Rebooted: the Future of Technology in Elections Report, 2016, http://publications.atlanticcouncil.org/electiontech/assets/report.pdf, 12.03.2019.

[13] MATCZAK, P., MĄCZKA, K., MILEWICZ, M., E-partycypacja. Zastosowania sondażu internetowego jako narzędzia partycypacyjnego, in: Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Społeczny, vol. 1/2015.

[14] MUSIAŁ-KARG, M., The influence of ICT on modern democracy. Selected dilemmas of electronic democracy, in: Przegląd Politologiczny, np. 2 (2016).

[15] MUSIAŁ-KARG, M., The Political Market and the Application of the Internet in: EDEM2011. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Electronic Democracy 2011, ed. A. Prosser, Austrian Computer Society, Vienna, 2011.

[16] MUSIAŁ-KARG, M., The Theory and Practice of Online Voting. The case of Estonia (selected issues), in: Athenaeum. Polish Political Science Studies, no 29 (2011).

[17] MUSIAŁ-KARG, M., KUŻEEWSKA, E., Electronic tools (e-tools) of Civic Participation in Poland. Any Perspectives for the Future?, in: Towarda a better future: the rule of law, democracy and polycentric development, vol. 1., Faculty of Law, St. Kliment Ofridski University – Bitola, Repyblic of Maceconia. Bitola, 2018

[18] OSSOWSKI, S., A Civic Budget as a form of civil participation, or an institutional PR tool. The Civic Budget in the City of Poznań, in: Przegląd Politologiczny, no 4 (2017).

[19] PÄIVÄRINTA, T., SÆBØ, Ø., Models of E-Democracy, in: Communications of the Association for In-formation Systems, vol. 17 (2006).

[20] POLAT, R. K., PRATCHETT, L., E-citizenship: Reconstructing the Public Online, in: Changing Local Governance, red. C. Durose, S. Greasley, L. Richarson, Changing Citizens, Bristol, 2009.

[21] SÆBØ, Ø., PÄIVÄRINTA, T., Autopoietic Cybergenres for e-Democracy? Genre analysis of a Web-Based Discussion Board, in: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Genre in Digital Documents, ed. R. H. J. Sprague, Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society, Big Island.

[22] SZARANOWIC-KUSZ, M., Budżet partycypacyjny w Polsce, Biuro Analiz Sejmowych, 2016. https://poledialogu.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/MSzaranowiczKusz-BP-w-Polsce-Infos_205.pdf, accessed 20.03.2018.

[23] TER HEDDE, M., SVENSSON, J., Online Discussion on Government Websites: Fact and Failure?, in: ICT, Citizens and Governance: After the Hype!, eds. A. Meijer, K. Boomsma, P. Wagenaar, Amsterdam–Berlin–Tokio, 2005.

[24] VAN DIJK, J., Digital Democracy: Vision and Reality , [in:] Public Administration in the Information Age: Revisited, eds. I. Snellen, M. Thaens, W. van de Donk, IOS-Press, Amsterdam–Berlin–Tokio–Washington, DC, 2012.

[25] VAN DIJK, J., Participation in Policy Making, in: Study on the Social Impact of ICT. Report for European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate- General, European Communities DOI, 2010, Luxemburg,e c.europa.eu/, 17.09.2012.

[26] VAN DIJK, J., The Network Society, Social Aspects of New Media , London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi, 2006.

[27] VASSIL, K., SOLVAK, M., VINKEL, P., TRECHSEL, A. H., ALVEREZ, R. M., The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015, in/ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 33, issue 3 (2016).

[28] ZISSIS, D., LEKKAS, D., Papadopoulou A. E., Enhancing Security in the Integration of E-Goverment: The E-School Initiative. The E-School Initiative, Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Web Information System and Technologies, 2, 2008.

Publication:

Central and Eastern European e|Dem and e|Gov Days 2019

Cyber Security and eGovernment
Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European E|Dem and E|Gov Days, May 2-3, 2019, Budapest
Facultas, 1. Ed., 536 p.
ISBN: 978-3-7089-1898-3,
ISBN: 978-3-903035-24-9

Editors: András Nemeslaki, Alexander Prosser, Dona Scola, Tamás Szádeczky